16.2.11

Gushing Glory

“C'est singulier! Moi, je pense jamais, mes idées pensent pour moi.”
(It's Strange! Me, I never think my ideas are for me (my sake)."
--Alphonse de Lamartine (1790-1869), French Poet

'Dis Honorable Discharge' sounds bad to everyone but Rocky Balboa.

(bet You can't guess what this is all about...I'll give you a minute to think about it.

For the impolite clue; it boils down to 'coming and going', and the fact that in this day and age, 2011 CE?, the medical community still doesn't know where women come from. Really, I read recently, even while using MRI studies of copulating couples they can't tell. The debate is first, whether women can 'come' at all, and second, if they do 'where exactly does it issue from?'. Some claim women can't/don't cum at all and that it's just urine--as if they can't do a simple sniff test to find out whether or not it is incontinence...



For a more refined take on this post, suitable for discussion in mixed company, members of the audience that can't stomach bodily functions may prefer to think of this survey in terms of PNP(pissingin) and NPN(notpissingin) bipolar junction transistors.

While I may have recently read the article Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Male and Female Genitals During Coitus and Female Sexual Arousal , it is not a recent article (first published in 1999).

The authors acknowledge "It has been extremely difficult to investigate anatomical changes during the act of coitus and the female sexual response".

The essential message being; "Since the medical establishment can't tell how or where a woman 'comes' from, the mainstream position is that her bladder fills during intercourse so it must be that any discharge resulting from sexual arousal is due to involuntary urination!"This way the woman does not ever believe she can have the equivalent of what we know as male ejaculation and if there is such a phenomenon as 'female ejaculation' the woman is misled into thinking that she is a 'Wets-y Betsie' and, consciously or subconsciously, is forced to suppress any such phenomenon from arising in her for fear of a disgraceful, embarrassing leak...

Triangulating Human Sexuality is not easy for someone that half the time can't locate their own vehicle in a mall parking lot, but here goes...
Surah 86 At-Tariq (الطَّارِقِ)
...
فَلْيَنظُرِ الْإِنسَانُ مِمَّ خُلِقَ 86:5
خُلِقَ مِن مَّاء دَافِقٍ 86:6
يَخْرُجُ مِن بَيْنِ الصُّلْبِ وَالتَّرَائِبِ 86:7

86:5 So let (such that) the Human Being See (Understands) Of What (they) Are Created
86:6 Created From/Of Watery Effluent (stream, race, influx, afflux, outpouring, inflow/outflow, pouring, pumping, effluence...)
86:7 Coming out (emerging, exiting, surfacing) from/of between the 'al-ssalbi' (n.; steel, Crux, crucifixion, loin, ramrod, cross-cut, betterment. v.; crucify, harden, consolidate, stiffen, temper, call out, sear, castigate. adj.; solid, firm, rigid, tough, stiff, concrete, robust, metallic, adamant, unyielding, inflexible, unkind, stark, horny, stubborn, tenacious, resistant, solidity, cruel, corneous, persistent, callous, stabile, out-and-out) and 'al-'ttaraa'ibi' (Alterae (Altair); var. رأب ra'b, bridge, garage; al-tara ibi (ForeFathers' + White Flyers).
In broad strokes, a woman's ejaculate? is probably tied in with the lymphatic or intersticial fluid and issues due to involuntary smooth muscle contractions during foreplay and/or orgasm. There may be more than one source of the feminine ejaculation, depending on the level of heightened sexual arousal. For example, from the vagina itself, and/or from the feminine physiology that corresponds (is the complementary dual, homologue) to the male phyiscal structures involved in masculine ejaculation.

According to wikipedia (which may not be the last word on the subject, but it does 'come in handy'--to turn a phrase) "The parts of the clitoris hidden inside the body include erectile tissue, glands, muscles, blood vessels, and nerves. In both the clitoris and the penis, there are two types of erectile tissue: body of caverns (corpus cavernosum) and spongy body (corpus spongiosum), which fill with blood during sexual response, causing an erection. The clitoral shaft...feels like a hard ridge about one-half to one inch long, and it rises toward the pubic mound for a short distance, then bends sharply and divides, forming two slender legs which are also made of spongy tissue. The legs flare out like the wishbone of a chicken. In both women and men, the urethra is surrounded by a ring of sponge."

The markers being the ''two slender legs' (see the description of the Summer Triangle) of the spongy tissue and 'flare out like the wishbone of a chicken" (the 'As Above...So Below' analogy being Sadr (Gamma Cygni) which lies prominently at the Center of the Northern Cross in the Cygnus Constellation (The Swan); its name comes from an Arabic phrase meaning "the hen's breast." (Anybody care to make a wish? Or do more Homework?)

27.1.11

The Big Idea

What's the Big Idea?!That's 5,6,7,8... too many times I tried to complete this paragraph about curvature and hyperbolic geometry only to have it get wiped out each time I Saved it or Posted it!

Tell You What...You can keep Your Low-Rank-O's Dumdressands and BoppingCrosses, have Your self-appointed and self-annointed MonkeyNutBrains MDsense sit ize their own kith and kin and themselves too while they're at it.

I don't particularly have any trouble distinguishing when I am on the Flat or in the Saddle and if they do---then, good, that's Exactly how it was Designed to Work.

Now quit messing with my Duckie post and wiping out the curvature paragraph pertaining to hyperbolic geometry on the Cosmic Scale...because that's how big the Truth can Get...BeYOnd Hyperbole!QQQ

Go Desensitize This Symptoms of chemical burns depend on the causing agent. However, most of them are characterized by a superficial or profound destruction of the tissue and a sensation of intense heat or pain. Some tissues are more vulnerable than others -- for example, even mildly corrosive substances can cause damage to one's eyes while not causing anything but discomfort on the hands.
If the injury occurs internally, it can also be associated with poisoning, which renders these type of burns more difficult to treat.


And by All Accounts others complaining of much milder symptoms due to the exposure were relocated. But, they all kept me returning to the same location--blithely explaining away any abnormal sign and symptom to me as a 'false positive' or 'false negative,' (All the while thinking, 'We've seen this sort of thing before; we convince our medical specimen it is all in her head and to make amends, somewhere down the line, someone will volunteer to have a pity-party for her (aka marry her) and take care of her because they can never own the mess they've made of Her life or make reparations any other way without letting the proverbial cat out of the bag; like by allowing this kind of criminal activity to actually be adjudicated in a court of law. As if! Never once stopping to think they picked the wrong specimen, believing there were no other 'witnesses,' since they could not see Him. The old we can't see Him, therefore, He must not Exist! Or, that a simple websearch doesn't turn up that this sort of thing has gone down Just As Viciously in the past (similar case in Louisiana 1996)? Yeah, it may have started out as an accident but that 'coctail' they injected her with at Harbor UCLA was malicious and planned--Ugh!)




...and everybody else ... pretended I was the only one complaining of some 'fictitious' sic-building-syndrome... (Science Hertz, but the Grammar Nazi is not supposed to make out worse than Hilter and PolPot combined...Right: Bizarro Comics January 4, 2011)...that's why I don't subscribe to their Morality (Do Unto others until you're done with them) or Your Physics (For every action there is an Equal and Opposite Reaction; in other words, Good deeds yield Bad results).

...That's why I don't want to be a Rock Star or a Wonder Tsar--Reinventing Physics Is Where I R.

If any of this is making me sound like my great grandmother 7 generations back, giving a shout out across the space-time continuum might have attenuated the message, only adding to the confusion.

If there was any French in Her, what She said was, 'Fou toi!' (sounds like fu.twa!)

Non Sequitur August 24, 2012
'The Laws of Physics Shall Be Strictly Enforced'
Not to be mistaken for the similar sounding Advisory Opinion, 'Fatweh!' issued by My Late Father's great grandfather 7 generations back--that would make Him Jed-Jed-Jedi--and what He said was, 'فتوى!'
At any rate, it's a moot point whether He said, 'This is my opinion!' or, She said, 'You crazy!'
Because in the Final Analysis according to forget me, aka منسي sounds like 'mansee', it's "Like saying Peace be upon you!"
('zaii call it salaamu 3alykum!' )
زي قوله سلام عليكم

'A fashionable way to say ;-Peace Be Upon You'!'